In the event of a burst hose line, what is the correct procedure?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the JBL Firefighter 1 State Test. Study using flashcards and multiple choice questions with hints and detailed explanations. Excel in your test!

The correct procedure in the event of a burst hose line is to utilize two lengths of hose to replace the section that has ruptured. This approach ensures that the integrity and functionality of the hose line system are maintained. By replacing the burst section with two new lengths, firefighters can ensure that the overall length of hose remains appropriate for the operational requirements while also allowing for more manageable repairs.

In many firefighting scenarios, the pressure and volume of water flowing through a hose can be quite significant, and simply using one length may not provide the necessary pressure or reach, especially in larger operations. Utilizing two lengths can enable better flexibility and coverage, allowing for more effective firefighting efforts.

In contrast, simply replacing the damaged section with one similar length may not address the potential for additional weaknesses in the hose line and could compromise safety and performance. Additionally, using duct tape to seal the burst is not a viable or safe solution, as adhesive materials cannot withstand the high pressures typically found in fire suppression systems, leading to potential failure and hazard. Leaving the ruptured section in the line also poses a risk of reduced water flow and effectiveness, which could endanger both firefighters and the success of the firefighting mission.